Markers of Tentativeness as a hint to fragile and conflicting evidence: A Study on Argumentation about Computer Use in Childhood

Thiebach M, Mayweg-Paus E, Jucks R

Abstract

We experimentally manipulated the use of two types of linguistic markers of tentativeness in scientific texts on the use of computers in childhood. Dependent measures were readers' comprehension and evaluation of arguments. Our results indicate that arguments including references to the source of information were perceived to be significantly more credible and stronger than arguments without these references. Based on our results, we discuss possibilities to foster an elaborated processing of science-related information and arguments.