[Rationing health care by thresholds for clinical benefit and its acceptance by the German population].

Schöne-Seifert B, Friedrich DR, Diederich A

Research article (journal) | Peer reviewed

Abstract

Fair rationing in publicly accessible health care has become a subject of current international debate. One suggestion is to cut reimbursement for any medical intervention below some threshold of small clinical benefit. One can further differentiate between thresholds of small expectable clinical benefit as such and thresholds of low chances for clinical success. Public acceptance of both types of thresholds has been tested in a population survey. Results are presented and discussed in this paper. (As supplied by publisher).

Details about the publication

JournalZeitschrift für Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualität im Gesundheitswesen (Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes)
Volume106
Issue6
Page range426-434
StatusPublished
Release year2012
Language in which the publication is writtenGerman
KeywordsHealth Services Accessibility; Patient Acceptance of Health Care; Germany; Health Services Needs and Demand; Medical Futility; Quality-Adjusted Life Years; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Humans; Cost Savings; Health Care Rationing; Treatment Outcome; National Health Programs; Health Priorities; Health Services Accessibility; Patient Acceptance of Health Care; Germany; Health Services Needs and Demand; Medical Futility; Quality-Adjusted Life Years; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Humans; Cost Savings; Health Care Rationing; Treatment Outcome; National Health Programs; Health Priorities

Authors from the University of Münster

Friedrich, Daniel
Institute of Ethics, History and Theory of Medicine
Schöne-Seifert, Bettina
Institute of Ethics, History and Theory of Medicine