[Rationing health care by thresholds for clinical benefit and its acceptance by the German population].

Schöne-Seifert B, Friedrich DR, Diederich A

Forschungsartikel (Zeitschrift) | Peer reviewed

Zusammenfassung

Fair rationing in publicly accessible health care has become a subject of current international debate. One suggestion is to cut reimbursement for any medical intervention below some threshold of small clinical benefit. One can further differentiate between thresholds of small expectable clinical benefit as such and thresholds of low chances for clinical success. Public acceptance of both types of thresholds has been tested in a population survey. Results are presented and discussed in this paper. (As supplied by publisher).

Details zur Publikation

FachzeitschriftZeitschrift für Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualität im Gesundheitswesen (Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes)
Jahrgang / Bandnr. / Volume106
Ausgabe / Heftnr. / Issue6
Seitenbereich426-434
StatusVeröffentlicht
Veröffentlichungsjahr2012
Sprache, in der die Publikation verfasst istDeutsch
StichwörterHealth Services Accessibility; Patient Acceptance of Health Care; Germany; Health Services Needs and Demand; Medical Futility; Quality-Adjusted Life Years; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Humans; Cost Savings; Health Care Rationing; Treatment Outcome; National Health Programs; Health Priorities; Health Services Accessibility; Patient Acceptance of Health Care; Germany; Health Services Needs and Demand; Medical Futility; Quality-Adjusted Life Years; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Humans; Cost Savings; Health Care Rationing; Treatment Outcome; National Health Programs; Health Priorities

Autor*innen der Universität Münster

Friedrich, Daniel
Institut für Ethik, Geschichte und Theorie der Medizin
Schöne-Seifert, Bettina
Institut für Ethik, Geschichte und Theorie der Medizin