Improving vocational students’ consideration of source information when deciding about science controversies

Stadtler, M., Scharrer, L., Macedo-Rouet, M., Rouet, J. F., & Bromme, R.

Research article (journal) | Peer reviewed

Abstract

We present an empirical investigation of a classroom training fostering vocational students’ consideration of source information when deciding about science-based controversies. The training was specifically aimed at raising students’ awareness of the division of cognitive labor and the resulting need to take a source’s competence into account when deciding whom to trust. Data were collected from a training group and a waiting list control group in a pretest–posttest design. The results show that students benefitted from the training in terms of their inclination to agree with pertinent expert sources rather than low-pertinent experts and to refer to the source of information to justify their judgment. Source memory was not affected by the training.

Details about the publication

JournalReading and Writing
Volume29
Issue4
Page range705-729
StatusPublished
Release year2016
Language in which the publication is writtenEnglish
DOI10.1007/s11145-016-9623-2
KeywordsText comprehension; Division of cognitive labor; Source evaluation; Science understanding

Authors from the University of Münster

Bromme-Koch, Rainer
Professorship for Educational Psychology (Prof. Bromme)
Scharrer, Lisa
Professorship for Educational Psychology (Prof. Bromme)
Stadtler, Marc
Professorship for Educational Psychology (Prof. Bromme)