Why do teachers and students (dis-)agree in judging student motivation? A lens model perspectiveOpen Access

Beck, J., Dutke, S., & Utesch, T.

Research article (journal) | Peer reviewed

Abstract

Background: Although teachers judge student motivation intuitively every day, little is known what information students and teachers prioritize to judge student motivation. Aim: We examined students’ and teachers’ judgments by applying the lens model, an approach explicitly developed to explain the emergence of social judgments by multiple attributes. Methods: Nineteen teachers each judged Md = 21 secondary school students’ motivation for a specific school subject on single-item scales (N = 447 students) as students did. Furthermore, subject-specific achievement goals, gender, migration background, and school grades served as cues potentially used in judging student motivation. Results: Students and teachers aligned with r = .24 (p < .001) on students’ subject-specific motivation. Linear mixed-effects models revealed that students predominantly value achievement goals for feeling motivated. Teachers overemphasized school grades, and to a lesser extent work-avoidance goals. They perceived students with a migration background as being less motivated. Discussion: Results demonstrate that different perceptions of why students are motivated can explain low agreement in judging motivation. Options how the judgments of students and teachers could be aligned are discussed.

Details about the publication

JournalEuropean Journal of Psychology of Education
Volume40
StatusPublished
Release year2025
Language in which the publication is writtenEnglish
DOI10.1007/s10212-025-01027-4
Keywordsjudgment; accuracy; cue utilization; assessment; biases

Authors from the University of Münster

Beck, Jan Ulrich
Department for didactics and teaching general science
Dutke, Stephan
nsitute for Psychologie in Education and Instruction
Utesch, Till Onno Friedrich
Junior professorship of educational science with the focus on school pedagogics: pedagogical diagnostics and potential development (Prof. Utesch)