Courts of law typically use quotations and references from cases in higher courts for their verdicts. However, they also refer to legal literature, verdicts from other legal systems or, indeed, literary texts. While in the former, the strategy to quote is part and parcel of the functional logic of law courts, the examples of the latter have no direct legal authority whatsoever. This project will provide a comparative study of the reasons law courts have to refer to such sources nevertheless and the methods they employ when doing so.
| Korten, Lars | |
| Petersen, Niels |
| Korten, Lars | |
| Petersen, Niels |
| Steigler-Herms, Joy Siriporn | |
| Wittmann, Laura Christin |
Duration: 01/07/2019 - 30/06/2024 | 1st Funding period Funded by: DFG - Collaborative Research Centre Type of project: Main DFG-project hosted at University of Münster |
| Zitierpraktiken von Bundesverfassungsgericht und kanadischem Supreme Court im Vergleich Candidate: Wittmann, Laura Christin | Supervisors: Petersen, Niels; Korten, Lars | Reviewers: Petersen, Niels; Korten, Lars Period of time: 01/01/2020 - 23/01/2024 Doctoral examination procedure finished at: Doctoral examination procedure at University of Münster |