Ein Plädoyer wider die Annahme einer fundamentalen Unterscheidung von Genese und Geltung in der Erkenntnistheorie

Seidel, Markus

Research article (journal) | Peer reviewed

Abstract

Many epistemologists believe that the distinction between the genesis and the validity of a belief is a fundamental presupposition of adequate epistemological reflection. In this article it will be argued that the arguments for this majority conviction are not convincing. As an alternative it is suggested that the distinction between epistemic and non-epistemic procedures should be regarded as fundamental for epistemology.

Details about the publication

JournalZeitschrift für Philosophische Forschung
Volume77
Issue4
Page range454-483
StatusPublished
Release year2023
Language in which the publication is writtenGerman
DOI10.3196/004433023838087467
Link to the full texthttps://www.ingentaconnect.com/contentone/klos/zphf/2023/00000077/00000004/art00003
KeywordsGenese; Geltung; Kontextunterscheidung; Induktion; Skeptizismus

Authors from the University of Münster

Seidel, Markus
Center for the Philosophy of Science