The Role of Clarity About Study Programme Contents and Interest in Student Evaluations of TeachingOpen Access

Feistauer, Daniela; Richter, Tobias

Research article (journal) | Peer reviewed

Abstract

Validity is an important issue when measuring teaching quality using student evaluations. This study examined the effects of psychology students’ subjective clarity about study contents and their prior interest in the subject as variables possibly biasing the evaluations of psychology courses. German students (N = 292) evaluated lectures and seminars over five years with a standardized questionnaire, yielding 3,348 data points. In cross-classified multilevel models, we separated the total variance into the variance components of course, teacher, student, and the Teacher x Student interaction and found evidence for biasing effects with regard to the students’ clarity about study contents and prior subject interest. These effects were small overall and were stronger for lectures than for seminars. These results suggest that the validity of evaluations of teaching in psychology can be improved by creating realistic expectations of what psychology is about before students choose psychology as a study subject.

Details about the publication

JournalPsychology Learning and Teaching
Volume17
Issue3
Page range272-292
StatusPublished
Release year2018
Language in which the publication is writtenEnglish
DOI10.1177/1475725718779727
Link to the full texthttps://doi.org/10.1177/1475725718779727
KeywordsCross-classified multilevel analysis; prior subject interest; student evaluations of teaching; subjective clarity about study contents; validity

Authors from the University of Münster

Feistauer, Daniela
Institute of Psychology