The Role of Clarity About Study Programme Contents and Interest in Student Evaluations of TeachingOpen Access

Feistauer, Daniela; Richter, Tobias

Forschungsartikel (Zeitschrift) | Peer reviewed

Zusammenfassung

Validity is an important issue when measuring teaching quality using student evaluations. This study examined the effects of psychology students’ subjective clarity about study contents and their prior interest in the subject as variables possibly biasing the evaluations of psychology courses. German students (N = 292) evaluated lectures and seminars over five years with a standardized questionnaire, yielding 3,348 data points. In cross-classified multilevel models, we separated the total variance into the variance components of course, teacher, student, and the Teacher x Student interaction and found evidence for biasing effects with regard to the students’ clarity about study contents and prior subject interest. These effects were small overall and were stronger for lectures than for seminars. These results suggest that the validity of evaluations of teaching in psychology can be improved by creating realistic expectations of what psychology is about before students choose psychology as a study subject.

Details zur Publikation

FachzeitschriftPsychology Learning and Teaching
Jahrgang / Bandnr. / Volume17
Ausgabe / Heftnr. / Issue3
Seitenbereich272-292
StatusVeröffentlicht
Veröffentlichungsjahr2018
Sprache, in der die Publikation verfasst istEnglisch
DOI10.1177/1475725718779727
Link zum Volltexthttps://doi.org/10.1177/1475725718779727
StichwörterCross-classified multilevel analysis; prior subject interest; student evaluations of teaching; subjective clarity about study contents; validity

Autor*innen der Universität Münster

Feistauer, Daniela
Institut für Psychologie