Evaluation of the effectiveness of a semi-finished occlusal appliance--a randomized, controlled clinical trial.

Ficnar T, Middelberg C, Rademacher B, Hessling S, Koch R, Figgener L.

Research article (journal) | Peer reviewed

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Painful temporomandibular disorders (TMDs) are usually treated with physiotherapy, self-exercises, medication-based therapy and splint therapy. For splint therapy different types of splints are available. Therefore this randomized controlled study compared the effectiveness of asemi-finishedocclusal appliance (SB) with a laboratory-made occlusal appliance (SS) in myofascial pain patients. METHOD: The trial subjects allocated to the experimental groups with the (SB) occlusal appliance and those provided with a laboratory-made occlusal appliance (SS) did, in addition, receive conservative treatment (self-exercises, drug-based and manual therapy). The control group was given conservative therapy (CO) only. Overall, a total of 63 patients participated in the study with each group consisting of 21 subjects. RESULTS: When the first follow-up examination took place (14 days after splint insertion) mouth opening within the SB group was significantly enlarged. When the second examination was conducted (2.5 months after splint insertion) mouth opening was significantly enlarged in both splint groups when compared with the initial value. In the control group, no significant enlargement of mouth opening was detected. At no point there was a significant reduction in the number of pressure-sensitive areas of the TMJ. On palpation of the masticatory muscles however, a significant reduction in the number of pressure-sensitive areas could be observed within the CO group and the SS group after 2.5 months. When comparing pain reduction (muscle/joint pain) and mouth opening, no significant differences could be detected between the treatments. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that TMD should be treated conservatively. In cases of restricted mouth opening, the additional use of occlusal appliances can eliminate the patient's discomfort more quickly. In this context, the tested,semi-finishedocclusal appliance appears to offer an immediately available, temporary alternative to laboratory-made splints.

Details about the publication

JournalHead and Face Medicine (Head Face Med)
Volume9
Issue5
Page range1-10
StatusPublished
Release year2013 (25/01/2013)
Language in which the publication is writtenEnglish
DOI10.1186/1746-160X-9-5
KeywordsMyofascial pain; Occlusal appliances; Pain; Randomized controlled trial; Temporomandibular disorders

Authors from the University of Münster

Ficnar, Tobias
Clinic for Prosthetic Dentistry and Biomaterials
Figgener, Ludger
Clinic for Prosthetic Dentistry and Biomaterials
Heßling, Stefan
Clinic for Prosthetic Dentistry and Biomaterials
Koch, Raphael
Institute of Biostatistics and Clinical Research (IBKF)
Middelberg, Claudius
Outpatient Clinic of Orthodontics
Rademacher, Bernd
Clinic for Prosthetic Dentistry and Biomaterials