The Effect of C-Arm Position on Femoral Tunnel Placement in Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction

Thürig G, Herbst E, Deichsel A, Peez C, Briese T, Glasbrenner J, Raschke MJ, Kittl C

Research article (journal) | Peer reviewed

Abstract

Compared with the ipsilateral C-arm position (ML5), the contralateral C-arm position (LM25) showed a smaller range with a lower standard deviation in identifying the femoral MPFL approach across all measurement methods. When applying the method according to Scho¨ttle et al26 to locate the femoral MPFL insertion point, it should be noted that the insertion point should be situated just proximal to the Blumensaat line in the contralateral view (LM25) in the proximal-distal orientation. In contrast, when using the ipsilateral view (ML5), the femoral MPFL footprint should be positioned just distal to the proximal edge of the medial condyle.

Details about the publication

JournalOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine (Orthop J Sports Med)
Volume12
Issue11
StatusPublished
Release year2024 (11/11/2024)
Language in which the publication is writtenEnglish
DOI 10.1177/23259671241288153
Keywordsknee; ligament; medial patellofemoral ligament; attachment site; anatomy; femoral tunnel positioning; C-arm

Authors from the University of Münster

Briese, Thorben
Clinic for Accident, Hand- and Reconstructive Surgery
Deichsel, Adrian
Clinic for Accident, Hand- and Reconstructive Surgery
Herbst, Elmar
Clinic for Accident, Hand- and Reconstructive Surgery
Kittl, Christoph
Clinic for Accident, Hand- and Reconstructive Surgery
Peez, Christian
Clinic for Accident, Hand- and Reconstructive Surgery
Raschke, Michael Johannes
Clinic for Accident, Hand- and Reconstructive Surgery