Semiautomatic lymph node segmentation in multislice computed tomography: impact of slice thickness on segmentation quality, measurement precision, and interobserver variability.

Buerke B, Puesken M, Beyer F, Gerss J, Weckesser M, Seifarth H, Heindel W, Wessling J

Research article (journal)

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine the impact of slice thickness on semiautomatic lymph node analysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thoracic multislice computed tomography (MSCT) of 46 patients with NSCLC were reconstructed at 1.0-, 3.0-, and 5.0-mm slice thickness. Two radiologists independently determined long and short axis diameter and volume of 299 thoracic lymph nodes by semiautomatic segmentation software. Necessity of manual correction (= relative difference between uncorrected and corrected segmented lymph node volume) and relative interobserver differences were determined. The precision of segmentation was expressed by relative measurement deviations (RMD) from the reference standard (mean of 1.0 mm datasets). Statistical analysis encompassed t test and Bland-Altman plots. RESULTS: Necessity of manual correction was significantly higher for 5.0 mm than for 3.0 (P = 0.042) or 1.0 mm (P = 0.0012). The RMD for long and short axis diameter were found to be independent of slice thickness, whereas the RMD for lymph node volume significantly (P = 0.021) increased from 4.0% at 1.0 mm (95% CI: 1.0%-3.5%) to 35% at 5.0 mm (95% CI: 10.5%-60.5%). The relative interobserver differences was consistently low for metric and volumetric parameters (eg, volume 2.3%, 95% CI: -7.4%-10.8% at 5.0 mm) with no difference in any of the slice thicknesses (P > 0.064). CONCLUSIONS: Significant deviations in lymph node volume together with excessive manual corrections suggest reconstruction of the data for semiautomatic lymph node assessment at a slice thickness of 1.0 mm but not exceeding 3.0 mm.

Details about the publication

JournalInvestigative Radiology (Invest Radiol)
Volume45
Issue2
Page range82-88
StatusPublished
Release year2010
Language in which the publication is writtenEnglish
DOI10.1097/RLI.0b013e3181c443e1

Authors from the University of Münster

Heindel, Walter Leonhard
Clinic of Radiology
Püsken, Michael
Clinic of Radiology
Seifarth, Harald
Clinic of Radiology
Weckesser, Jochen Matthias
Clinic for Nuclear Medicine
Weßling, Johannes
Clinic of Radiology