Logical Deducibility and Logicality in 1837

Roski, Stefan

Research article (book contribution) | Peer reviewed

Abstract

This paper investigates Bolzano’s views on the distinction between logical and non-logical notions. Even though it is crucial for Bolzano’s definitions of logical consequence and logical analyticity, his remarks on how the distinction is to be drawn are few and far between. Bolzano’s adherence to a traditional, pre-Fregean syntax, complicates interpreting these remarks even further. The paper offers an interpretation of the remarks on which they suggest that Bolzano identified logicality with topic-neutrality. It further discusses Bolzano’s views on the systematic relevance of the notion of logical consequence.

Details about the publication

EditorsKlev, Ansten
Book titleThe Architecture and Archaeology of Modern Logic
PublisherSpringer Science+Business Media
Place of publicationCham
Title of seriesLogic, Epistemology, and the Unity of Science (ISSN: 2214-9775)
Volume of series61
Statusaccepted / in press (not yet published)
Language in which the publication is writtenEnglish
ISBN978-3-031-52410-3
DOI10.1007/978-3-031-52411-0_15
Link to the full texthttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-52411-0_15
KeywordsLogical Consequence; Inference; Bolzano; Logicality

Authors from the University of Münster

Roski, Stefan Peter
Center for the Philosophy of Science