Logical Deducibility and Logicality in 1837

Roski, Stefan

Forschungsartikel (Buchbeitrag) | Peer reviewed

Zusammenfassung

This paper investigates Bolzano’s views on the distinction between logical and non-logical notions. Even though it is crucial for Bolzano’s definitions of logical consequence and logical analyticity, his remarks on how the distinction is to be drawn are few and far between. Bolzano’s adherence to a traditional, pre-Fregean syntax, complicates interpreting these remarks even further. The paper offers an interpretation of the remarks on which they suggest that Bolzano identified logicality with topic-neutrality. It further discusses Bolzano’s views on the systematic relevance of the notion of logical consequence.

Details zur Publikation

Herausgeber*innenKlev, Ansten
BuchtitelThe Architecture and Archaeology of Modern Logic
VerlagSpringer Science+Business Media
ErscheinungsortCham
Titel der ReiheLogic, Epistemology, and the Unity of Science (ISSN: 2214-9775)
Nr. in Reihe61
Statusakzeptiert / in Druck (unveröffentlicht)
Sprache, in der die Publikation verfasst istEnglisch
ISBN978-3-031-52410-3
DOI10.1007/978-3-031-52411-0_15
Link zum Volltexthttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-52411-0_15
StichwörterLogical Consequence; Inference; Bolzano; Logicality

Autor*innen der Universität Münster

Roski, Stefan Peter
Zentrum für Wissenschaftstheorie (ZfW)