Understanding Ability and Reliability Differences Measured with Count Items: The Distributional Regression Test Model and the Count Latent Regression Model

Beisemann, M.; Forthmann, B.; Doebler, P.

Forschungsartikel (Zeitschrift) | Peer reviewed

Zusammenfassung

In psychology and education, tests (e.g., reading tests) and self-reports (e.g., clinical questionnaires) generate counts, but corresponding Item Response Theory (IRT) methods are underdeveloped compared to binary data. Recent advances include the Two-Parameter Conway-Maxwell-Poisson model (2PCMPM), generalizing Rasch’s Poisson Counts Model, with item-specific difficulty, discrimination, and dispersion parameters. Explaining differences in model parameters informs item construction and selection but has received little attention. We introduce two 2PCMPM-based explanatory count IRT models: The Distributional Regression Test Model for item covariates, and the Count Latent Regression Model for (categorical) person covariates. Estimation methods are provided and satisfactory statistical properties are observed in simulations. Two examples illustrate how the models help understand tests and underlying constructs.

Details zur Publikation

FachzeitschriftMultivariate Behavioral Research
Jahrgang / Bandnr. / Volume59
Ausgabe / Heftnr. / Issue3
StatusVeröffentlicht
Veröffentlichungsjahr2024
DOI10.1080/00273171.2023.2288577
Link zum Volltexthttps://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2023.2288577
StichwörterItem response theory; count data; Conway-MaxwellPoisson distribution; item covariates; person covariates; 2PCMPM; EM algorithm

Autor*innen der Universität Münster

Forthmann, Boris
Professur für Statistik und Forschungsmethoden in der Psychologie (Prof. Nestler)