A model of social influence in sports

Basic data for this talk

Type of talkscientific talk
Name der VortragendenBeier, Marius; van Meurs, Edda; Strauss, Bernd
Date of talk12/10/2023
Talk languageEnglish

Information about the event

Name of the eventSCAPPS 2023 Conference
Event period12/10/2023 - 14/10/2023
Event locationKingston
Event websitehttps://www.scapps.org/conference/
Organised bySCAPPS

Abstract

Whether we cheer for our favourite players or boo their opponents does not always have the effect we intend it to have. Active spectators (here: spectators displaying directly influencing behaviour) seem to cause increases in motor performances through cheering and decreases through booing – but also the opposite or no effect. Previous studies and theories have suggested a range of mechanisms to explain this variability in effects; these may include threat perception, self-presentational tendencies, emotional support, or increased importance. The present systematic review maps the existing evidence of active spectators on motor performances (excluding reports of correlations between audience size and home advantage) to identify mediating and moderating factors, synthesize empirical findings, and highlight gaps to inform future research. In forward searches, we found 11,015 records in eleven databases (Scopus, PsycINFO, PsycArticles, Sport Discus, Web of Science, ProQuest Dissertations, OvidSP, PsyArXiv, OSF Preprints, SportRxiv, Theses Commons), of which N=23 met the inclusion criteria (n=8 experiments, n=5 observational studies, n=10 archival analyses). The review identified several mediators: self-presentational concerns, arousal, motivation, social cognitions, cognitive distraction and self-focus, which may explain social influence in sports. Their influence might vary depending on moderators like the task’s (e.g., difficulty, type), the spectator’s (e.g., behaviour, familiarity) and the performer’s characteristics (e.g., gender, narcissism). However, only very few studies have demonstrated these relationships empirically. The findings have implications for our sport psychological understanding, reaching from social psychological processes to performance under pressure to home field advantage, as well as for the research gaps that will be highlighted.
Keywordssocial influence; active spectators; systematic review; mediation; moderation; social psychology

Speakers from the University of Münster

Strauß, Bernd
Professorship for Sport Psychology (Prof. Strauß)
van Meurs, Edda
Professorship for Sport Psychology (Prof. Strauß)