Immediate weight bearing without immobilization for operatively treated ankle fractures is safe - A systematic review

Baumbach, S. F.; Rellensmann, K.; Spindler, F. T.; Böcker, W.; Barg, A. D.; Mittlmeier, T.; Ochman, S.; Rammelt, S.; Polzer, H.

Review article (journal) | Peer reviewed

Abstract

BACKGROUND - METHODS - RESULTS - CONCLUSION - LEVEL OF EVIDENCE; This systematic literature review compared weight bearing (WB) vs. partial- / non-weight bearing (NWB) and mobilization (MB) vs. immobilization (IMB) for surgically treated ankle fractures.; Five databases were searched. Eligible were (quasi-)randomized controlled trials comparing at least two different postoperative treatment protocols. The risk of bias was assessed using the RoB-2 toolkit. The primary outcome was complication rate, secondary outcome Olerud and Molander Ankle Score (OMAS), range of motion (ROM), and return to work (RTW).; Out of 10,345 studies, 24 papers were eligible. Thirteen studies (n = 853) compared WB/NWB, 13 studies (n = 706) MB/IMB with a moderate study quality. WB did not increase the risk for complications but resulted in superior short-term outcomes for OMAS, ROM, RTW. 12 studies found no inferior results for MB compared to IMB.; Early and immediate WB and MB do not increase the complication rates but result in superior short term outcome scores.; Level I Systematic Review.

Details about the publication

JournalFoot and Ankle Surgery
Volume29
Issue4
Page range306-316
StatusPublished
Release year2023
Language in which the publication is writtenEnglish
DOI10.1016/j.fas.2023.04.006
KeywordsHumans; Ankle Fractures; Range of Motion, Articular; Weight-Bearing; Treatment Outcome

Authors from the University of Münster

Ochman, Sabine
Clinic for Accident, Hand- and Reconstructive Surgery