Biomechanical Analysis of Coracoid Stability After Coracoplasty: How Low Can You Go?

Heilmann, Lukas F.; Sussiek, Julia; Raschke, Michael J.; Langer, Martin F.; Frank, Andre; Wermers, Jens; Michel, Philipp A.; Dyrna, Felix; Schliemann, Benedikt; Katthagen, J. Christoph

Research article (journal) | Peer reviewed

Abstract

In correspondence with the findings of this study, careful preoperative planning should be used to measure the maximum reasonable amount of coracoplasty to be performed. A postoperative coracoid thickness of 4 mm should remain.; While even a 3-mm coracoplasty caused significant weakening of the coracoid, the individual failure loads were higher than those of the predicted ADLs. A critical value of 4 mm of coracoid thickness should be preserved to ensure the stability of the coracoid process.; Arthroscopic coracoplasty is a procedure for patients affected by subcoracoid impingement. To date, there is no consensus on how much of the coracoid can be resected with an arthroscopic burr without compromising its stability.; To determine the maximum amount of the coracoid that can be resected during arthroscopic coracoplasty without leading to coracoid fracture or avulsion of the conjoint tendon during simulated activities of daily living (ADLs).; Controlled laboratory study.; A biomechanical cadaveric study was performed with 24 shoulders (15 male, 9 female; mean age, 81 ± 7.9 years). Specimens were randomized into 3 treatment groups: group A (native coracoid), group B (3-mm coracoplasty), and group C (5-mm coracoplasty). Coracoid anatomic measurements were documented before and after coracoplasty. The scapula was potted, and a traction force was applied through the conjoint tendon. The stiffness and load to failure (LTF) were determined for each specimen.; < .001). Postoperatively, coracoids with a thickness ≥4 mm were able to withstand ADLs. - CLINICAL RELEVANCE - CONCLUSION - BACKGROUND - PURPOSE - STUDY DESIGN - METHODS - RESULTS

Details about the publication

JournalOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine (Orthop J Sports Med)
Volume10
Issue2
StatusPublished
Release year2022 (03/03/2022)
Language in which the publication is writtenEnglish
DOI10.1177/23259671221077947
Keywordscoracoplasty; subcoracoid impingement; coracohumeral interval; coracoid fracture; arthroscopy

Authors from the University of Münster

Dyrna, Felix
Clinic for Accident, Hand- and Reconstructive Surgery
Frank, Andre
Clinic for Accident, Hand- and Reconstructive Surgery
Heilmann, Lukas Friedrich
Clinic for Accident, Hand- and Reconstructive Surgery
Katthagen, Jan Christoph
Clinic for Accident, Hand- and Reconstructive Surgery
Langer, Martin
Clinic for Accident, Hand- and Reconstructive Surgery
Michel, Philipp Alexander
Clinic for Accident, Hand- and Reconstructive Surgery
Raschke, Michael Johannes
Clinic for Accident, Hand- and Reconstructive Surgery
Schliemann, Benedikt
Clinic for Accident, Hand- and Reconstructive Surgery
Wermers, Jens
Institute of Musculoskeletal Medicine (IMM)