Machine learning based prediction models in male reproductive health: Development of a proof-of-concept model for Klinefelter Syndrome in azoospermic patients.

Krenz, Henrike; Sansone, Andrea; Fujarski, Michael; Krallmann, Claudia; Zitzmann, Michael; Dugas, Martin; Kliesch, Sabine; Varghese, Julian; Tüttelmann, Frank; Gromoll, Jörg

Research article (journal) | Peer reviewed

Abstract

Background: Due to the highly variable clinical phenotype, Klinefelter Syndrome is underdiagnosed. Objective: Assessment of supervised machine learning based prediction models for identification of Klinefelter Syndrome among azoospermic patients, and comparison to expert clinical evaluation. Materials and methods: Retrospective patient data (karyotype, age, height, weight, testis volume, follicle-stimulating hormone, luteinizing hormone, testosterone, estradiol, prolactin, semen pH and semen volume) collected between January 2005 and June 2019 were retrieved from a patient data bank of a University Centre. Models were trained, validated and benchmarked based on different supervised machine learning algorithms. Models were then tested on an independent, prospectively acquired set of patient data (between July 2019 and July 2020). Benchmarking against physicians was performed in addition. Results: Based on average performance, support vector machines and CatBoost were particularly well-suited models, with 100% sensitivity and >93% specificity on the test dataset. Compared to a group of 18 expert clinicians, the machine learning models had significantly better median sensitivity (100% vs. 87.5%, p = 0.0455) and fared comparably with regards to specificity (90% vs. 89.9%, p = 0.4795), thereby possibly improving diagnosis rate. A Klinefelter Syndrome Score Calculator based on the prediction models is available on http://klinefelter-score-calculator.uni-muenster.de. Discussion: Differentiating Klinefelter Syndrome patients from azoospermic patients with normal karyotype (46,XY) is a problem that can be solved with supervised machine learning techniques, improving patient care. Conclusions: Machine learning could improve the diagnostic rate of Klinefelter Syndrome among azoospermic patients, even more for less-experienced physicians.

Details about the publication

JournalAndrology
Volume10
Issue3
Page range534-544
StatusPublished
Release year2021 (16/12/2021)
Language in which the publication is writtenEnglish
DOI10.1111/andr.13141
Link to the full texthttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/andr.13141
KeywordsKlinefelter Syndrome; azoospermia; machine learning; prediction models; reproductive genetics; reproductive health

Authors from the University of Münster

Fujarski, Michael
Institute of Medical Informatics
Gromoll, Jörg
Centre of Reproductive Medicine and Andrology
Kliesch, Sabine
Centre of Reproductive Medicine and Andrology
Krallmann, Claudia
Centre of Reproductive Medicine and Andrology
Tüttelmann, Frank
Institute of Reproductive Genetics
Varghese, Julian
Institute of Medical Informatics
Zitzmann, Michael
Centre of Reproductive Medicine and Andrology