Comparison of different phenotypic approaches to screen and detect mecC-harboring methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus

Kriegeskorte A., Idelevich E., Schlattmann A., Layer F., Strommenger B., Denis O., Paterson G., Holmes M., Werner G., Becker K.

Research article (journal) | Peer reviewed

Abstract

Similar to mecA, mecC confers resistance against beta-lactams, leading to the phenotype of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). However, mecC-harboring MRSA strains pose special difficulties in their detection. The aim of this study was to assess and compare different phenotypic systems for screening, identification, and susceptibility testing of mecC-positive MRSA isolates. A well-characterized collection of mecC-positive S. aureus isolates (n 111) was used for evaluation. Routinely used approaches were studied to determine their suitability to correctly identify mecC-harboring MRSA, including three (semi)automated antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) systems and five selective chromogenic agar plates. Additionally, a cefoxitin disk diffusion test and an oxacillin broth microdilution assay were examined. All mecC-harboring MRSA isolates were able to grow on all chromogenic MRSA screening plates tested. Detection of these isolates in AST systems based on cefoxitin and/or oxacillin testing yielded overall positive agreements with the mecC genotype of 97.3% (MicroScan WalkAway; Siemens), 91.9% (Vitek 2; bioMérieux), and 64.9% (Phoenix, BD). The phenotypic resistance pattern most frequently observed by AST devices was “cefoxitin resistance/oxacillin susceptibility,” ranging from 54.1% (Phoenix) and 83.8% (Vitek 2) to 92.8% (WalkAway). The cefoxitin disk diffusion and oxacillin broth microdilution assays categorized 100% and 61.3% of isolates to be MRSA, respectively. The chromogenic media tested confirmed their suitability to reliably screen for mecC-harboring MRSA. The AST systems showed false-negative results with varying numbers, misidentifying mecC-harboring MRSA as methicillin-susceptible S. aureus. This study underlines cefoxitin’s status as the superior surrogate mecC-positive MRSA marker.

Details about the publication

JournalJournal of Clinical Microbiology (J Clin Microbiol)
Volume56
Issue1
StatusPublished
Release year2018
Language in which the publication is writtenEnglish
DOI10.1128/JCM.00826-17
Link to the full texthttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85040060955&origin=inward
KeywordsBroth microdilution; Cefoxitin; Chromogenic media; Disk diffusion; MecC; Methicillin resistance; MRSA; Oxacillin; Staphylococcus aureus; Susceptibility testing

Authors from the University of Münster

Becker, Karsten
Institute of Medical Microbiology
Idelevich, Evgeny
Institute of Medical Microbiology
Kriegeskorte, André
Institute of Medical Microbiology
Schlattmann, Andreas
Institute of Medical Microbiology