FDG μPET Fails to Detect a Disease-Specific Phenotype in Rats Transgenic for Huntington's Disease - A 15 Months Follow-up Study.

Reilmann R, Lippross V, Hölzner E, Gigengack F, Bohlen S, Kugel H, Deppe M, Osada N, Lücke M, Riess O, Nguyen H, Von Hörsten S, Schäfers K, Schäfers M, Jacobs A, Hermann S.

Research article (journal) | Peer reviewed

Abstract

Background: FDG-PET detects hypometabolism in premanifest and symptomatic Huntington's disease (HD). A cross-sectional study suggested that whole-brain FDG-PET is capable to detect a phenotype in transgenic (tg) HD rats. Recently, a longitudinal follow-up study showed no FDG-PET changes in tgHD rats. Both studies applied small sample sizes and analysis was limited to whole-brain or striatum. Objective: We therefore performed a follow-up study in a larger cohort of tgHD and wild-type (wt) rats encompassing several pre-defined regions of interest (ROIs) and hypothesis free voxel-by-voxel SPM analysis to clarify whether FDG-PET can detect a phenotype in tgHD rats and to determine onset and effect sizes of changes over time. Methods: N = 19 tgHD- and n = 20 wt-rats, mixed gender, were included. Repeated small animal FDG-μPET and MRI were performed at 5,10,15, and 20 months of age. ROIs encompassing entire brain, cortex, striatum, thalamus, subventricular-zone, and cerebellum were placed manually on the MRI and transferred to the co-registered μPET. Mean and maximal FDG-PET activities within ROIs were calculated and normalized to cerebellar FDG uptake. Activity and spatially normalized FDG-μPET were compared between groups on a hypothesis-free voxel-by-voxel basis using SPM. Results: FDG uptake showed changes over time in both tgHD- and wt-rats, however, there was no consistent difference between tgHD- and wt-rats in both the manual ROI and SPM analysis. Conclusions: In this transgenic rat model of HD FDG-μPET imaging does not detect significant alterations at the ages investigated. Further investigations are warranted employing other age groups and alternative imaging biomarkers for neuronal degeneration, respectively.

Details about the publication

JournalJournal of Huntington's Disease
Volume4
Issue1
Page range37-47
StatusPublished
Release year2015
Language in which the publication is writtenEnglish
DOI10.3233/JHD-130084
Link to the full texthttp://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84930190747&origin=inward
Keywordsanimal model; biomarker; Huntington's disease; imaging

Authors from the University of Münster

Bohlen, Stefan
Department for Neurology
Deppe, Michael
Department for Neurology
Gigengack, Fabian
European Institute of Molecular Imaging (EIMI)
Hermann, Sven
European Institute of Molecular Imaging (EIMI)
Hölzner, Eva-Maria
Department for Neurology
Jacobs, Andreas Hans
European Institute of Molecular Imaging (EIMI)
Schäfers, Klaus
European Institute of Molecular Imaging (EIMI)
Schäfers, Michael
European Institute of Molecular Imaging (EIMI)