Continuous stroke unit electrocardiographic monitoring versus 24-hour holter electrocardiography for detection of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation after stroke

Rizos T., Guntner J., Jenetzky E., Marquardt L., Reichardt C., Becker R., Reinhardt R., Hepp T., Kirchhof P., Aleynichenko E., Ringleb P., Hacke W., Veltkamp R.

Research article (journal) | Peer reviewed

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE-: Cardioembolism in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (pxAF) is a frequent cause of ischemic stroke. Sensitive detection of pxAF after stroke is crucial for adequate secondary stroke prevention; the optimal diagnostic modality to detect pxAF on stroke units is unknown. We compared 24-hour Holter electrocardiography (ECG) with continuous stroke unit ECG monitoring (CEM) for pxAF detection. METHODS-: Patients with acute ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack were prospectively enrolled. After a 12-channel ECG on admission, all patients received 24-hour Holter ECG and CEM. Additionally, ECG monitoring data underwent automated analysis using dedicated software to identify pxAF. Patients with a history of atrial fibrillation or with atrial fibrillation on the admission ECG were excluded. RESULTS-: Four hundred ninety-six patients (median age, 69 years; 61.5% male) fulfilled all inclusion criteria (ischemic stroke: 80.4%; transient ischemic attack: 19.6%). Median stroke unit stay lasted 88.8 hours (interquartile range, 65.0-122.0). ECG data for automated CEM analysis were available for a median time of 64.0 hours (43.0-89.8). Paroxysmal AF was documented in 41 of 496 patients (8.3%). Of these, Holter detected pxAF in 34.1%; CEM in 65.9%; and automated CEM in 92.7%. CEM and automated CEM detected significantly more patients with pxAF than Holter (P<0.001), and automated CEM detected more patients than CEM (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS-: Automated analysis of CEM improves pxAF detection in patients with stroke on stroke units compared with 24-hour Holter ECG. The comparative usefulness of prolonged or repetitive Holter ECG recordings requires further evaluation. © 2012 American Heart Association, Inc.

Details about the publication

JournalStroke
Volume43
Issue10
Page range2689-2694
StatusPublished
Release year2012
Language in which the publication is writtenEnglish
DOI10.1161/STROKEAHA.112.654954
Link to the full texthttp://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84866734710
Keywordsacute ischemic stroke; atrial fibrillation; ECG; Holter ECG; stroke unit; transient ischemic attack

Authors from the University of Münster

Aleynichenko, Elena
Department for Cardiovascular Medicine