An empirical test of competing hypotheses for the annuity puzzle

Goedde-Menke M, Lehmensiek-Starke M, Nolte S

Research article (journal) | Peer reviewed

Abstract

This paper conducts the first empirical test of numerous rational and behavioral hypotheses for the low annuity demand observed in private markets. We designed a questionnaire based on findings from economics and psychology, enabling us to simultaneously investigate a broad range of motives that presumably constitute the reluctance to buy annuities.To address the interdependence of financial product choice and domain-specific investor sophistication, we construct and employ a novel, comprehensive measure of ‘‘annuity literacy''. The results from a representative survey among German consumers reveal that both established rational and so far untested behavioral motives are significant barriers to annuitize wealth. Furthermore, the overall level of annuity literacy is rather low, with most respondents lacking knowledge of an annuity's core mechanics. These findings disclose promising directions for annuity suppliers, policy makers, and researchers towards resolving the annuity puzzle.

Details about the publication

JournalJournal of Economic Psychology
Volume43
IssueAugust 2014
Page range75-91
StatusPublished
Release year2014
Language in which the publication is writtenEnglish
DOI10.1016/j.joep.2014.04.001
KeywordsRetirement planning; Old-age poverty; Consumer attitudes; Trust in financial institutions; Knowledge; Information behavior

Authors from the University of Münster

Goedde-Menke, Michael
Chair of Finance
Nolte, Sven
Chair of Finance