Disease-modifying treatments and cognition in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: A meta-analysis.

Landmeyer NC; Bürkner PC; Wiendl H; Ruck T; Hartung HP; Holling H; Meuth SG; Johnen A

Research article (journal) | Peer reviewed

Abstract

OBJECTIVE - METHODS - RESULTS - CONCLUSIONS; Disease-modifying treatments (DMTs) are the gold standard for slowing disability progression in multiple sclerosis (MS), but their effects on cognitive impairment, a key symptom of the disease, are mostly unknown. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the differential effects of DMTs on cognitive test performance in relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS).; PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library were searched for studies reporting longitudinal cognitive performance data related to all major DMTs. The standardized mean difference (Hedges g) between baseline and follow-up cognitive assessment was used as the main effect size measure.; Forty-four studies, including 55 distinct MS patient samples, were found eligible for the systematic review. Twenty-five studies were related to platform therapies (mainly β-interferon [n = 17] and glatiramer acetate [n = 4]), whereas 22 studies were related to escalation therapies (mainly natalizumab [n = 14] and fingolimod [n = 6]). Reported data were mostly confined to the cognitive domain processing speed. A meta-analysis including 41 studies and 7,131 patients revealed a small to moderate positive effect on cognitive test performance of DMTs in general (g = 0.27, 95% confidence interval [CI] = [0.21-0.33]), but no statistically significant differences between platform (g = 0.27, 95% CI = [0.18-0.35]) and escalation therapies (g = 0.28, 95% CI = [0.19-0.37]) or between any single DMT and β-interferon.; DMTs are effective in improving cognitive test performance in RRMS, but a treatment escalation mainly to amend cognition is not supported by the current evidence. Given the multitude of DMTs and their widespread use, the available data regarding differential treatment effects on cognitive impairment are remarkably scant. Clinical drug trials that use more extensive cognitive outcome measures are urgently needed.

Details about the publication

JournalNeurology
Volume94
Issue22
Page rangee2373-e2383
StatusPublished
Release year2020 (02/06/2020)
Language in which the publication is writtenEnglish
DOI10.1212/WNL.0000000000009522
Link to the full texthttps://www.neurology.org/doi/10.1212/WNL.0000000000009522?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub%20%200pubmed
KeywordsCognition; Cognitive Dysfunction; Fingolimod Hydrochloride; Glatiramer Acetate; Humans; Immunologic Factors; Immunosuppressive Agents; Interferon-beta; Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting; Natalizumab; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Authors from the University of Münster

Johnen, Andreas
Department for Neurology
Landmeyer, Nils Christian
Department for Neurology
Ruck, Tobias
Department for Neurology
Wiendl, Heinz Siegfried
Department for Neurology