Bridging the information gap in organic chemical reactions.

Schrader ML; Schäfer FR; Schäfers F; Glorius F

Review article (journal) | Peer reviewed

Abstract

The varying quality of scientific reports is a well-recognized problem and often results from a lack of standardization and transparency in scientific publications. This situation ultimately leads to prominent complications such as reproducibility issues and the slow uptake of newly developed synthetic methods for pharmaceutical and agrochemical applications. In recent years, various impactful approaches have been advocated to bridge information gaps and to improve the quality of experimental protocols in synthetic organic publications. Here we provide a critical overview of these strategies and present the reader with a versatile set of tools to augment their standard procedures. We formulate eight principles to improve data management in scientific publications relating to data standardization, reproducibility and evaluation, and encourage scientists to go beyond current publication standards. We are aware that this is a substantial effort, but we are convinced that the resulting improved data situation will greatly benefit the progress of chemistry.

Details about the publication

JournalNature Chemistry
Volume16
Issue4
Page range491-498
StatusPublished
Release year2024 (01/05/2024)
Language in which the publication is writtenEnglish
DOI10.1038/s41557-024-01470-8
Link to the full texthttps://www.nature.com/articles/s41557-024-01470-8
Keywordsdata management; publications; reproducibility

Authors from the University of Münster

Glorius, Frank
Professur für Organische Chemie (Prof. Glorius)
Schäfer, Felix Richard
Professur für Organische Chemie (Prof. Glorius)
Schäfers, Felix
Professur für Organische Chemie (Prof. Glorius)
Schrader, Malte Lennard
Professur für Organische Chemie (Prof. Glorius)