Does speculation increase volatility in grain futures markets? Evidence from the Interwar Chicago Board of Trade

Iorgulescu, Elissa A. M.; Pütz, Alexander

Research article (journal) | Peer reviewed

Abstract

A key justification for futures regulation in the interwar period was the idea that speculators were making grain prices volatile, and therefore speculative activity needed to be restricted. This paper uses new data on grain futures contracts traded at the Chicago Board of Trade to empirically assess whether speculators Granger caused volatility in futures markets during the interwar period. We find that speculators did not Granger cause volatility, but volatile markets Granger caused speculative activity. These results suggest that speculators entered volatile markets but did not increase volatility.

Details about the publication

JournalEuropean Review of Economic History
Volume29
Issue1
Page range1-27
Article numberheae011
StatusPublished
Release year2024 (16/09/2024)
Language in which the publication is writtenEnglish
DOI10.1093/ereh/heae011
Link to the full texthttps://academic.oup.com/ereh/article/29/1/1/7756855
KeywordsSpeculation; Regulation; Grain Futures Markets; Volatility; Interwar Period; Chicago Board of Trade

Authors from the University of Münster

Iorgulescu, Elissa Ana Maria
Professorship of Finance (Prof. Schneider)
Pütz, Alexander
Professur für Volkswirtschaftslehre, insbesondere Monetäre Ökonomie (Prof. Bohl)