Matched unrelated or matched sibling donors result in comparable survival after allogeneic stem-cell transplantation in elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia: a report from the cooperative German Transplant Study Group.

Schetelig J, Bornhäuser M, Schmid C, Hertenstein B, Schwerdtfeger R, Martin H, Stelljes M, Hegenbart U, Schäfer-Eckart K, Füssel M, Wiedemann B, Thiede C, Kienast J, Baurmann H, Ganser A, Kolb HJ, Ehninger G

Research article (journal)

Abstract

PURPOSE: In patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), differential indications for matched sibling and unrelated hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HCT) are considered, and arbitrary age limits for HCT exist. We sought to determine whether donor type is a prognostic factor in elderly patients in the era of high-resolution DNA-based HLA typing. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed univariate and multivariate analyses of event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients older than 50 years with standard- or high-risk AML who had received an allogeneic HCT between 1995 and 2005. Available DNA from donors and recipients of unrelated HCT was retyped so that the HLA-A, -B, -C, and -DRB1 alleles could be characterized in detail. Unrelated donors (UDs) were classified as matched (8/8), possibly matched (matched, but incomplete information), partially matched (one mismatch), or poorly matched (two or more mismatches) according to the final typing results. RESULTS: Data from 368 patients with a median age of 57 years (range, 50 to 73 years) were included. Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that patients' disease status at HCT (P < .001) and the cytogenetic risk (P < .001) highly significantly predicted EFS and OS. Compared with patients with matched sibling donors, the adjusted relative risk of EFS was 0.7 (95% CI, 0.4 to 1.1) for patients with matched UDs and 1.0 (95% CI, 0.7 to 1.6) for patients with partially matched UDs. CONCLUSION: Donor type is not a major prognostic factor for HCT in elderly patients with standard- or high-risk AML.

Details about the publication

JournalJournal of Clinical Oncology (J Clin Oncol)
Volume26
Issue32
Page range5183-91
StatusPublished
Release year2008
Language in which the publication is writtenEnglish
DOI10.1200/JCO.2007.15.5184
KeywordsHLA Antigens; Risk Factors; Disease-Free Survival; Proportional Hazards Models; Adult; Siblings; Adolescent; Recurrence; Time Factors; Middle Aged; Kaplan-Meiers Estimate; Treatment Outcome; Child; Age Factors; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; Humans; Risk Assessment; Leukemia Myeloid Acute; Living Donors; Germany; Aged; Transplantation Homologous; Retrospective Studies; Histocompatibility Testing; Aged 80 and over; HLA Antigens; Risk Factors; Disease-Free Survival; Proportional Hazards Models; Adult; Siblings; Adolescent; Recurrence; Time Factors; Middle Aged; Kaplan-Meiers Estimate; Treatment Outcome; Child; Age Factors; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; Humans; Risk Assessment; Leukemia Myeloid Acute; Living Donors; Germany; Aged; Transplantation Homologous; Retrospective Studies; Histocompatibility Testing; Aged 80 and over

Authors from the University of Münster

Stelljes, Matthias
Medical Clinic of Internal Medicine A (Hematology, Oncology, and Oneumology) (Med A)
Thiede, Christian
Workgroup Spin Phenomena in Low-D Systems (Prof. Donath)