Mosaic retroposon insertion patterns in placental mammals.

Churakov G, Kriegs JO, Baertsch R, Zemann A, Brosius J, Schmitz J

Research article (journal)

Abstract

One and a half centuries after Charles Darwin and Alfred Russel Wallace outlined our current understanding of evolution, a new scientific era is dawning that enables direct observations of genetic variation. However, pure sequence-based molecular attempts to resolve the basal origin of placental mammals have so far resulted only in apparently conflicting hypotheses. By contrast, in the mammalian genomes where they were highly active, the insertion of retroelements and their comparative insertion patterns constitute a neutral, virtually homoplasy-free archive of evolutionary histories. The "presence" of a retroelement at an orthologous genomic position in two species indicates their common ancestry in contrast to its "absence" in more distant species. To resolve the placental origin controversy we extracted approximately 2 million potentially phylogenetically informative, retroposon-containing loci from representatives of the major placental mammalian lineages and found highly significant evidence challenging all current single hypotheses of their basal origin. The Exafroplacentalia hypothesis (Afrotheria as the sister group to all remaining placentals) is significantly supported by five retroposon insertions, the Epitheria hypothesis (Xenarthra as the sister group to all remaining placentals) by nine insertion patterns, and the Atlantogenata hypothesis (a monophyletic clade comprising Xenarthra and Afrotheria as the sister group to Boreotheria comprising all remaining placentals) by eight insertion patterns. These findings provide significant support for a "soft" polytomy of the major mammalian clades. Ancestral successive hybridization events and/or incomplete lineage sorting associated with short speciation intervals are viable explanations for the mosaic retroposon insertion patterns of recent placental mammals and for the futile search for a clear root dichotomy.

Details about the publication

JournalGenome Research (Genome Res)
Volume19
Issue5
Page range868-875
StatusPublished
Release year2009
Language in which the publication is writtenEnglish
DOI10.1101/gr.090647.108
KeywordsHumans; Placenta; Evolution Molecular; Mammals; Mutagenesis Insertional; Retroelements; Base Sequence; Xenarthra; Molecular Sequence Data; Animals; Female; Sequence Alignment; Phylogeny; Genome; Humans; Placenta; Evolution Molecular; Mammals; Mutagenesis Insertional; Retroelements; Base Sequence; Xenarthra; Molecular Sequence Data; Animals; Female; Sequence Alignment; Phylogeny; Genome

Authors from the University of Münster

Brosius, Jürgen
Institute of Experimental Pathology
Schmitz, Jürgen
Institute of Experimental Pathology

Habilitationen, aus denen die Publikation resultiert

Echoes from the Past: What Ancient Genomic Insertions say about the Phylogeny of Species
Candidate: Schmitz, Jürgen | Reviewers: Kurtz, Joachim
Period of time: 17/04/2012 - 25/04/2013
Habilitation procedure finished at: Habilitation procedure at University of Münster