Coding of incisional pain in the brain: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study in human volunteers.

Pogatzki-Zahn EM, Wagner C, Meinhardt-Renner A, Burgmer M, Beste C, Zahn PK, Pfleiderer B

Research article (journal)

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: In this study, the activation of different brain areas after an experimental surgical incision was assessed by functional magnetic resonance imaging, and the pathophysiological role of distinct brain activation patterns for pain perception after incision was analyzed. METHODS: Thirty male volunteers (mean age +/-SD, 25+/- 5 yr) received an experimental incision (4 mm) within the volar aspect of the right forearm using a ceramic scalper blade, and 14 volunteers (mean age +/- SD, 25 +/- 4 yr) received a sham procedure. Magnetic resonance images were taken before, during (0-2 min), and after incision or sham procedure (2-4.5, 4.5-10, 24-29, and 44-49 min) at a 3T scanner using a block design. Subjective pain ratings by a numerical pain scale were performed between the scans. RESULTS: Functional magnetic resonance imaging analysis showed a distinct temporal profile of activity within specific brain regions during and after the injury. Lateralization (predominantly contralateral to the incision) and increased brain activity of the somatosensory cortex, frontal cortex, and limbic system were observed in subjects after incision, when compared with individuals receiving sham procedure. Peak brain activation occurred about 2 min after incision and decreased subsequently. A distinct correlation between evoked pain ratings and brain activity was observed for the anterior cingulate cortex, insular cortex, thalamus, frontal cortex, and somatosensory cortex. CONCLUSION: These findings show different and distinct cortical and subcortical activation patterns over a relevant time period after incision. Pain sensitivity hereby has an influence on the activity profile. This may have important implications for encoding ongoing pain after a tissue injury, for example, resting pain in postoperative patients.

Details about the publication

JournalAnesthesiology
Volume112
Issue2
Page range406-417
StatusPublished
Release year2010
Language in which the publication is writtenEnglish
DOI10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181ca4c82
KeywordsHumans; Oxygen; Brain Mapping; Image Processing Computer-Assisted; Male; Pain; Brain; Young Adult; Questionnaires; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Adult; Cluster Analysis; Pain Measurement; Neural Pathways; Forearm Injuries; Humans; Oxygen; Brain Mapping; Image Processing Computer-Assisted; Male; Pain; Brain; Young Adult; Questionnaires; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Adult; Cluster Analysis; Pain Measurement; Neural Pathways; Forearm Injuries

Authors from the University of Münster

Burgmer, Markus
Clinic of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy
Pfleiderer, Bettina
Clinic of Radiology
Pogatzki-Zahn, Esther
Clinic for Anaesthesiology, Surgical Critical Care Medicine and Pain Therapy
Zahn, Peter
Clinic for Anaesthesiology, Surgical Critical Care Medicine and Pain Therapy