Efficacy of Emergency Penetrating Keratoplasty with Cryopreserved Human Donor Corneas.

Bidzan M; Eter N; Uhlig CE

Research article (journal) | Peer reviewed

Abstract

INTRODUCTION - METHODS - RESULTS - CONCLUSION; To investigate the long-term outcomes of emergency penetrating keratoplasty using cryopreserved human donor corneas in the management of actual or imminent corneal perforation.; A retrospective analysis was performed of the treatment efficacy of emergency penetrating keratoplasty using a cryopreserved human donor cornea, in 14 eyes of 14 patients with corneal ulcers of different etiology. For comparison, the medical histories of 14 patients who had undergone penetrating keratoplasty with the same indication, but received a regularly processed human corneal graft, were retrospectively analyzed. In both groups, the primary endpoint for graft failure was repeat surgery, defined as the necessity for amniotic membrane transplantation, conjunctival flap, or repeat penetrating keratoplasty, during a follow-up time of maximally 12 months.; The difference in the need for repeated surgeries between the cryopreserved human donor cornea group and cultivated tissue graft group was not statistically significant (p = 0.835). Specifically, repeat complex surgery of any kind within 6 months was necessary in 50% of the cryopreserved cornea group and in 57.1% of the control group, with no further surgical interventions during the remainder of the follow-up period. However, repeat penetrating keratoplasty occurred more frequently in the cryopreserved cornea group (n = 5) than in the control group (n = 1) during the first 12 months after treatment (p = 0.048).; Cryopreserved corneas appear to be a viable option for promptly addressing emergencies and stabilizing the corneal situation, providing a faster solution compared to waiting for fresh tissue availability. However, repeat penetrating keratoplasty is more frequent when cryopreserved human donor corneas are used. Cryopreserved human donor corneas may be useful if surgical treatment is urgent and alternative options, such as tissue use, a conjunctival flap, or multilayer amniotic membrane transplantation, are not available.

Details about the publication

JournalOphthalmology and Therapy
Volume13
Issue4
Page range979-994
StatusPublished
Release year2024 (30/04/2024)
Language in which the publication is writtenEnglish
DOI10.1007/s40123-024-00889-z
KeywordsCorneal perforation; Corneal tissue preparation; Corneal ulcer; Cryopreserved corneal graft; Penetrating keratoplasty

Authors from the University of Münster

Eter, Nicole
Clinic for Ophthalmology
Uhlig, Constantin
Clinic for Ophthalmology