EXC 2060 C3-25 - Between Religious Tradition and Aesthetic Innovation: The Amimeticism of Icons in 19th and 20th Century Russian Art and Literature

Basic data for this project

Type of projectSubproject in DFG-joint project hosted at University of Münster
Duration at the University of Münster01/01/2022 - 31/12/2025 | 1st Funding period

Description

Icons hold a special place in Russian culture, reaching far beyond their significance as cult images in the Orthodox rite. In the cultural and socio-political debates of the 19th century, the Slavophiles saw icons as symbols of an original, uniquely Russian tradition, establishing a sacral pictorial tradition independent of Western European influences. In terms of technique, the icon is distinguished by the use of inverse perspective and internal light without a visible source, as well as the concept of collective authorship of artists working in a prescribed tradition, handed down through the centuries. Due to its position in an Orthodox sanctuary, the icon in the traditional understanding forms a point of transition from the earthly to the transcendental world. According to this project's thesis, the icon lends itself to modern conceptions of visual and verbal art because, fundamentally - in its gesture of transcendence, as well as both in the techniques of its creation, as in its basic theological concept of the image, it challenges mimesis as a mode of depicting worldly reality. In this respect, discussions of the icon invariably also pertain to the status of art itself, its position in relation to existing reality, as well as to a higher or different, aspired reality. The icon is thus used to articulate a world view, which can extend to the political realm. The project will trace the iconic gesture of transcendence from Romanticism (Puškin) to the art of the avant-garde (Malevič). Realism constitutes a second focus, in which the description of icon (and icon making) will be examined in relation to concepts of mimesis and to the ethical implications of being an artist. Thus, Gogol' contrasts secular and sacred art in Portret (The Portrait), Dostoevsky depicts Holbein's image of Christ in the grave as an anti-icon in Idiot (The Idiot), and Leskov represents the icon tradition of the Old Believers in Zapečatlennyj angel (The Sealed Angel).

KeywordsReligion und Politik
Funding identifierEXC 2060/1
Funder / funding scheme
  • DFG - Cluster of Excellence (EXC)

Project management at the University of Münster

Wutsdorff, Irina

Applicants from the University of Münster

Wutsdorff, Irina

Related main project

Duration: 01/01/2019 - 31/12/2025 | 1st Funding period
Funded by: DFG - Cluster of Excellence
Type of project: Main DFG-project hosted at University of Münster

Publications of the University of Münster resulting from the project

Wutsdorff, Irina (2021)
In: Allerkamp Andrea, Schmidt Sarah (eds.), Handbuch Literatur & Philosophie535-539BerlinDe Gruyter. doi:10.1515/9783110484823-067
Research article (book contribution) | Published
Wutsdorff, Irina (2023)
In: Zander, Laura A.; Kramp-Seidel, Nicola (eds.), Europe in Law and Literature. Transdisciplinary Voices in Conversation227-231Berlin, BostonDe Gruyter. doi:10.1515/9783111075693-022
Research article (book contribution) | Published
Wutsdorff, Irina (2025)
In: Schnittstelle Germanistik5(2)175-181. doi:10.33675/SGER/2025/2/12
Review article (journal) | Peer reviewed | Published

Doctorates resulting from the project

[Working title] Transformation Processes of the Icon Tradition in Soviet Film
Candidate: Amodio, Daniela Maria | Supervisors: Wutsdorff, Irina
Period of time: 01/09/2022 - today
Doctoral examination procedure finished at: Doctoral examination procedure at University of Münster