How reliable are students’ evaluations of teaching quality? A variance components approachOpen Access

Feistauer, Daniela; Richter, Tobias

Forschungsartikel (Zeitschrift) | Peer reviewed

Zusammenfassung

The inter-rater reliability of university students’ evaluations of teaching quality was examined with cross-classified multilevel models. Students (N = 480) evaluated lectures and seminars over three years with a standardised evaluation questionnaire, yielding 4224 data points. The total variance of these student evaluations was separated into the variance components of courses, teachers, students and the student/teacher interaction. The substantial variance components of teachers and courses suggest reliability. However, a similar proportion of variance was due to students, and the interaction of students and teachers was the strongest source of variance. Students’ individual perceptions of teaching and the fit of these perceptions with the particular teacher greatly influence their evaluations. This casts some doubt on the validity of student evaluations as indicators of teaching quality and suggests that aggregated evaluation scores should be used with caution.

Details zur Publikation

FachzeitschriftAssessment & Evaluation in Higher Education
Jahrgang / Bandnr. / Volume42
Ausgabe / Heftnr. / Issue8
Seitenbereich1263-1279
StatusVeröffentlicht
Veröffentlichungsjahr2016
Sprache, in der die Publikation verfasst istEnglisch
DOI10.1080/02602938.2016.1261083
Link zum Volltexthttps://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2016.1261083
StichwörterCross-classified multilevel analysis; Inter-rater reliability; student evaluations of teaching; variance components

Autor*innen der Universität Münster

Feistauer, Daniela
Institut für Psychologie