Coping with global uncertainty: Perceptions of COVID-19 psychological distress, relationship quality, and dyadic coping for romantic partners across 27 countriesOpen Access

Randall AK, Leon G, Basili E, Martos T, Boiger M, Baldi M, Hocker L, Kline K, Masturzi A, Aryeetey R, Bar-Kalifa E, Boon SD, Botella L, Burke T, Carnelley K, Carr A, Dash A, Fitriana M, Gaines SO, Galdiolo S, Claire M H, Joo S, Kanth B, Karademas E, Karantzas G, Landolt SA, McHugh L, Milek A, Murphy E, Natividade JC, Portugal A, Quiñones Á, Relvas AP, Rumondor PCB, Rusu P, Sallay V, Saul LA, Schmitt DP, Sels L, Shujja S, Taylor LK, Ozguluk SB, Verhofstadt L, Yoo G, Zemp M, Donato S, Totenhagen CJ, Eickels RL, Anaba EA, Beauchemin-Roy S, Berry A, Brassard A, Chesterman S, Ferguson L, Fonseca G, Gaugue J, Geonet M, Hermesch N, Knox L, Lafontaine M, Lawless N, Londero-Santos A, Major S, Marot TA, Mullins E, Otermans PCJ, Ariela F P, Parise M, Parvin R, De M, Péloquin K, Rebelo B, Righetti F, Romano D, Salavati S, Samrock S, Serea M, Seok CB, Sotero L, Stafford O, Thomadakis C, Topcu-Uzer C, Ugarte C, Yun LW, Simon-Zámbori P, Siau CS, Duca D, Filip C, Park H, Wearen S, Bodenmann G, Chiarolanza C

Forschungsartikel (Zeitschrift) | Peer reviewed

Zusammenfassung

Following the global outbreak of COVID-19 in March 2020, individuals report psychological distress associated with the “new normal”—social distancing, financial hardships, and increased responsibilities while working from home. Given the interpersonal nature of stress and coping responses between romantic partners, based on the systemic transactional model this study posits that perceived partner dyadic coping may be an important moderator between experiences of COVID-19 psychological distress and relationship quality. To examine these associations, self-report data from 14,020 people across 27 countries were collected during the early phases of the COVID-19 pandemic (March–July, 2020). It was hypothesized that higher symptoms of psychological distress would be reported post-COVID-19 compared to pre-COVID-19 restrictions (Hypothesis 1), reports of post-COVID-19 psychological distress would be negatively associated with relationship quality (Hypothesis 2), and perceived partner DC would moderate these associations (Hypothesis 3). While hypotheses were generally supported, results also showed interesting between-country variability. Limitations and future directions are presented.

Details zur Publikation

FachzeitschriftJournal of Social and Personal Relationships
Jahrgang / Bandnr. / Volumena
Statusonline first
Veröffentlichungsjahr2021
Sprache, in der die Publikation verfasst istEnglisch
DOI10.1177/02654075211034236
Link zum Volltexthttps://doi.org/10.1177/02654075211034236
Stichwörterrelationship quality; dyadic coping; distress; COVID-19; multination

Autor*innen der Universität Münster

Milek, Anne
FB 07 - Psychologie und Sportwissenschaft: Betriebseinheit Psychologie
Juniorprofessur für Paar- und Familienpsychologie (Prof. Milek)