Metrics Gone Wrong: What Managers Can Learn from the 2016 US Presidential Election

Kübler, Raoul Pauwels, Koen

Forschungsartikel (Zeitschrift) | Peer reviewed

Zusammenfassung

In the 2016 presidential election, the vast majority of available polls showed a comfortable lead for Hillary Clinton throughout the whole race, but in the end, she lost. Campaign managers could have known better, if they had had a closer look at other data sources and variables that – like polls – show voter engagement and preferences. In the political arena, donations, media coverage, social media followership, engagement and sentiment may similarly indicate how well a candidate is doing, and most of these variables are available for free. Validating the bigger picture with alternative data sources is not limited to politics. The latest marketing research shows that online-consumer-behavior metrics can enrich, and sometimes replace, traditional funnel metrics. Trusting a single ‘silver bullet’ metric does not just lead to surprises, it can also mislead managerial decision-making. Econometric models can help disentangle a complex web of dynamic interactions and show immediate and lagged effects of marketing or political events.

Details zur Publikation

Jahrgang / Bandnr. / Volume13
Seitenbereich30-35
StatusVeröffentlicht
Veröffentlichungsjahr2021
Sprache, in der die Publikation verfasst istEnglisch
DOI10.2478/nimmir-2021-0005
Link zum Volltexthttps://www.sciendo.com/article/10.2478/nimmir-2021-0005

Autor*innen der Universität Münster

Kübler, Raoul Volker
Juniorprofessur für Marketing (Prof. Kübler) (jpm)