Thoracic epidural analgesia with low concentration of bupivacaine induces thoracic and lumbar sympathetic block: a randomized, double-blind clinical trial.

Freise H, Meissner A, Lauer S, Ellger B, Radke R, Bruewer M, Brodner G, Van Aken HK, Sielenkämper AW, Fischer LG

Forschungsartikel (Zeitschrift)

Zusammenfassung

BACKGROUND: Clinical benefits of thoracic epidural anesthesia (TEA) are partly ascribed to thoracic sympathetic block. However, data regarding sympathetic activity during TEA are scarce and contradictory. This prospective, randomized, double-blind study evaluated the segmental propagation of sympathetic block after low-concentration, high-volume TEA using digital thermography. METHODS: Twenty-four patients were included in the study. Thoracic epidural catheters were placed at a median insertion level of T8-T9. Patients were accommodated for 20 min to the room temperature of 23 degrees +/- 0.3 degrees C. Skin temperature was recorded by digital thermography. After baseline measurement of heart rate, arterial pressure, and core body and skin temperature, 10 ml saline (control group) or 10 ml bupivacaine, 0.25% (TEA group), respectively, was administered epidurally. Five minutes (t5) and 20 min (t20) after baseline measurements, hemodynamic parameters and core body temperature were again measured, and sensory block was identified by loss of cold-warm discrimination. In the thumb, the toe, and each thoracic dermatome, difference from baseline temperature was calculated at t5 and t20. Data were analyzed by Mann-Whitney U test. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics did not differ among groups. Median spread of sensory block at t20 was T5-L5. At both t5 and t20, skin temperature decreased more in the control group than in the TEA group in all thoracic dermatomes (P < 0.05). Toe temperature increased in the TEA group compared with the control group (P < 0.05), whereas thumb temperature remained unchanged. CONCLUSION: TEA with 10 ml bupivacaine, 0.25%, induced thoracic and lumbar sympathetic block that precedes and exceeds sensory block. Caudal limit of sympathetic block could not be demonstrated in this study.

Details zur Publikation

FachzeitschriftAnesthesiology
Jahrgang / Bandnr. / Volume109
Ausgabe / Heftnr. / Issue6
Seitenbereich1107-1112
StatusVeröffentlicht
Veröffentlichungsjahr2008
Sprache, in der die Publikation verfasst istEnglisch
DOI10.1097/ALN.0b013e31818db16c
StichwörterDouble-Blind Method; Middle Aged; Analgesia Epidural; Female; Lumbosacral Region; Prospective Studies; Aged; Thorax; Humans; Adult; Autonomic Nerve Block; Skin Temperature; Male; Bupivacaine; Double-Blind Method; Middle Aged; Analgesia Epidural; Female; Lumbosacral Region; Prospective Studies; Aged; Thorax; Humans; Adult; Autonomic Nerve Block; Skin Temperature; Male; Bupivacaine

Autor*innen der Universität Münster

Fischer, Lars
Klinik für Anästhesiologie, operative Intensivmedizin und Schmerztherapie
Freise, Hendrik
Klinik für Anästhesiologie, operative Intensivmedizin und Schmerztherapie
Lauer, Stefan
Klinik für Anästhesiologie, operative Intensivmedizin und Schmerztherapie
Radke, Robert
Klinik für Kardiologie III
Van Aken, Hugo K.
Klinik für Anästhesiologie, operative Intensivmedizin und Schmerztherapie